Industry refutes "delaying" allegation
Mark Brownrigg: the regional Emissions Trading Scheme would be very easy to avoid
The UK Chamber of Shipping has rebuffed the idea that the shipping industry is trying employ “delaying tactics” around the introduction of further emissions regulation.
The accusation came from the recent UK Government's House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee report, which said shipping was simply trying to use “delaying tactics” with regard to its calls for a global shipping emissions scheme to be developed through the International Maritime Organization (IMO) rather than being included in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.
Mark Brownrigg, director general of the UK Chamber of Shipping told The Motorship that although the EU ETS has recently taken the aviation industry under its wing, aviation, by comparison, is fundamentally a point to point journey and should not be taken as a model for shipping.
“Shipping, on the other hand, isn’t bilateral, it’s multilateral, with as many as six countries at each end of a trade route,” pointed out Brownrigg. He added, “Aside from requiring fiendishly complex regulation and potentially negative impact to European trade, fundamentally the regional Emissions Trading Scheme would be very easy to avoid.”
Brownrigg went on to say that the recent UK Committee on Climate Change report advised a global shipping agreement and added there are two ideas that need further debate: one is centred on carbon trading, the other is a compensation fund or levy system. The Chamber has published two practical documents to show how either could work, although Brownrigg admits there “is some political play” that needs to work itself out between the emerging and mature economies for the debate to move forward.
Images for this article - click to enlarge
Unless otherwise stated, all images copyright © Mercator Media 2012. This does not exclude the owner's assertion of copyright over the material.
