Does seaborne thermal coal’s future depend upon CCUS or NH3 co-firing?

“K” Line and Kobe Steel will assess the performance of the binary cycle power generation system under real operating conditions

Source: K Line

Rumours of seaborne coal’s demise have been greatly exaggerated, to paraphrase Mark Twain, but shipowners should eye proposed restrictions on new projects in Asia.

While the commercial shipping sector has been focused on the IMO’s 2023 GHG Strategy discussions, and upcoming discussion of mid-term measures, it may have been distracted from environmental developments affecting important downstream markets, such as seaborne coal.

Singapore is currently finalising a Singapore Asia Taxonomy, which is likely to require existing thermal coal capacity to close by 2040 at the latest. Much of the discussion revolves around definitions of abatement, as proponents of net zero technologies (such as carbon capture or ammonia injection) endeavour to include these solutions among acceptable options.

Continue this article…

Already subscribed? SIGN IN now


Sign up for FREE to continue this article!

Want to read more before deciding on a subscription? It only takes a minute to sign up for a free account and you’ll get to enjoy:

  • Weekly newsletters providing valuable news and information on the shipping sector
  • Full access to our news archive
  • Live and archived webinars, podcasts and videos
  • Articles on innovations and current trends in the shipping industry
  • Our extensive archive of data, research and intelligence

Get more free content sign up today

Ready to subscribe? Choose from one of our subscription packages for unlimited access!